if you believe that any major company doesn't do espionage you are kidding yourself. They don't get caught doing it and if they do they suffer what Mclaren suffered. Fair enough, but that doesn't mean no one is doing it.
If by exchanging info on balance of the cars(i am not even going into whether they used it) mclaren were able to deliver a top car and ferrari couldn't that tells you so much for their own engineering. There is no such thing as copied info. The one that shines is the best. Google came onto the web after seeing 7 dfferent search engines already doing the rounds. They grabbed the best minds and delivered the best offing. Its not espionage there but the point being if you can do a better design you are the best.
mate, I dunno what you wrote a big definition of espionage for.As I said, my answer was for
If such good technology was copied from ferrari, you would reckon ferrari would be doing pretty well with 100% of their own technology.
and you are going around questioning the legality and normality of Espionage, as well as glorifying Mclaren saying espionage was the best thing that they have done by giving example of google

Yeah it was the best thing they did

they came right on the top didn't they? ooops i mean right at the bottom
Anyway all said and done, Mclaren had and has the better car and champion drivers. Ferrari can cry and crib and keep doing so for next 21 years as far as i go
Formula One Drivers" World Championships won by Mclaren till now - 11
Formula One Constructors" World Championships won by Mclaren till now - 8
Source
Formula One Drivers" World Championships won by Ferrari till now - 14
Formula One Constructors" World Championships won by Ferrari till now - 15
Source
And this is after 21 years of famine in Ferrari
Mate, Mclaren never had better car compared to Ferrari, remove that illusion from your mind

and may be in coming years they will prove better , you never know which other driver in Mclaren will try to get information again
